EPA’s Clean Power Plan: 50 Chefs Stir the Pot

In its ground-breaking “Clean Power Plan” released 2 June, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to work with 49 states to slash the CO2 intensity of fossil-fuel power generation by 2030. The headlines were simple enough: US plans to cut its emissions 30% from 2005 levels. But what the regulation actually does is lay out a series of (convoluted) state-level targets designed to reduce the carbon intensity of states’ power. In this Analyst Reaction we offer here a high-level look at these targets with more in-depth analysis to come in coming days for BNEF clients.


• Headlining the regulations are a series of emissions rate (lb/MWh) targets unique to each state. And the variation among states is stark: some states face substantially stiffer reduction targets than others.
• The wide variation among states is based on the agency’s evaluation of what it calls each state’s emissions ‘framework’: existing fossil generation, zero-carbon generation, energy efficiency potential and the outlook for both coal-plant retirements and low-carbon deployment in the future.
• EPA was required to establish performance standards achievable under a best system of emission reduction (BSER) method, which includes consideration of cost and technical feasibility, among other factors.
• The BSER proposed by EPA is based on mechanisms that fall into four categories, which the EPA describes as ‘building blocks’: heat rate improvements, dispatch of lower-emitting power plants, zero-carbon generation and end-use energy efficiency
• The agency also solicited other technologies and strategies, which may include market-based trading programmes and multi-state compliance activities. In soliciting these so-called ‘outside-the-fence’ compliance methods, EPA is entering uncharted regulatory territory; all previous power-plant emissions regimes have focussed on technologies and operating mechanisms at the point of emissions only.
• On orders from President Obama, EPA must finalise the proposed standards by June 2015. Complete individual state plans are due June 2017. Complete multi-state plans are due June 2018. States may obtain extensions under certain circumstances.
• As a result of the lbs of CO2 per MWh produced metric, the joint rulemaking’s outcome could well be delayed and is subject to weakening by state inertia and legal challenges.

Get the PDF.

About Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) is an industry research firm focused on helping energy professionals generate opportunities. With a team of experts spread across six continents, BNEF provides independent analysis and insight, enabling decision-makers to navigate change in an evolving energy economy.
Sign up for our free weekly newsletter →

Want to learn how we help our clients put it all together? Contact us