Cruz Win Hits Corn’s Clout, Emboldens Ethanol Foes in Senate

(Bloomberg) — Senator Ted Cruz’s victory in the Iowa

Republican caucuses emboldens other critics of federal biofuel

mandates just as the U.S. Senate is poised to consider a measure

that would gut the decade-old program.

The Senate could vote on proposals to spike the program’s

ethanol mandate or sunset the entire renewable fuel standard in

2022 as part of a broad energy bill now being debated in the


Refiners, restaurant owners and other critics of federal

biofuel mandates seized on Cruz’s caucus win Monday in the face

of fierce opposition from ethanol backers, including Iowa

Governor Terry Branstad. The pro-ethanol group America’s

Renewable Future ran ads against Cruz and trailed him in buses

during campaign stops in the state.

“The verdict from the cornfields of Iowa last night was

that the RFS is no longer a third rail that GOP leadership

should be afraid to touch,” said Stephen Brown, vice president

of federal government affairs for refiner Tesoro Corp., in an e-mail. “They can man-up and do something constructive here to

confront this fatally flawed program. They key is finding the

right approach to help set that stage.”

Cruz, while professing his support for growing the biofuels

market, called for an end to subsidies for all forms of energy

and said he wanted to see the renewable fuel standard phased


‘Clear Message’

“A clear message coming out of Iowa is that whatever

political influence ethanol used to have in the state, those

days are now over,” George David Banks, executive vice President

of the American Council for Capital Formation said in a

statement. “Very few Iowans are going to their caucus in support

of continuing to prop-up our failed federal corn-ethanol mandate

regime, and that’s not something likely to escape the notice of

politicians and policy makers in Washington.”

Bob Shrum, a Democratic campaign adviser, said the Cruz win

proves that declaring fealty to ethanol is “no longer necessary

politics in Iowa.”

“Ted Cruz, who I don’t agree with on much of anything,

proved that this is no longer the third rail of Iowa politics,”

Shrum said on a conference call organized by groups opposed to

the RFS.

No Setback

Ethanol backers pushed back against the idea the caucus

results were a setback. “The narrative coming out after last

night’s Iowa caucus that the domestic ethanol industry is

somehow on the ropes is false,” Bob Dinneen, president of the

Renewable Fuels Association trade group, said in an e-mail.

Although the ethanol industry’s political clout in Iowa may

have shifted, the legislative landscape hasn’t, said Bloomberg

Intelligence analyst Rob Barnett.

“Cruz’s victory disrupts the narrative that you have to

sing ethanol’s praise in order to win Iowa, but I wouldn’t

expect any immediate shift in biofuel policy as a result,”

Barnett said in an e-mail.

For one thing, Cruz’s win was far from a landslide;

renewable fuel standard supporters Donald Trump and Marco Rubio

captured a greater combined share of the caucus vote. And, in an

election year, it’s hard to advance any major policy changes in

Congress, particularly those that have staunch, influential

defenders on Capitol Hill.

One of those ethanol boosters, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley,

cautioned against misreading the caucus results as a referendum

on biofuel mandates.

Ethanol Vote

“You look at one person that made a big deal out of doing

away with the RFS. He came in tops, but you got to remember that

other people supporting ethanol got 72 percent of the vote if

you add them all up separately,” Grassley, a Republican, told

reporters in a conference call Tuesday. “And then you have to

wait until who’s going to be the next president of the United

States, and we’re only through one state, so at this point I

wouldn’t draw too many conclusions about ethanol.”

America’s Renewable Future said “Big Oil” was claiming “a

false victory” in the wake of the Iowa results.

“Their No. 1 candidate has moved closer to ethanol and

further from oil,” the group said in an e-mailed statement. “He

has even committed to repealing subsidies for the oil industry.

Those are unmistakable signs that the relevancy and importance

of ethanol are dominant.”

The renewable fuel standard requires steadily escalating

volumes of biofuels to be blended into the country’s gasoline

and diesel supplies. Designed to shrink the nation’s dependence

on foreign crude and curb greenhouse-gas emissions, the law pits

oil companies and refiners such as Exxon Mobil Corp., Valero

Energy Corp. and Tesoro Corp. against farmers in the corn-rich

Midwest who are fighting to preserve the mandates.

15 Billion

Since 2005, when Congress passed the RFS, ethanol’s share

of gasoline consumption has jumped to 10 percent from about 3

percent, data from the Energy Information Administration show.

Production of the fuel increased to a record 14.9 billion

gallons in 2015 from 3.9 billion gallons in 2005, government

data show.

Oil companies and trade groups that put their muscle into

lifting the crude export ban last year now will dedicate that

attention to repealing or revising the renewable fuel standard.

Both the American Petroleum Institute and the nation’s top

refining trade group, the American Fuel and Petrochemical

Manufacturers, have singled out the issue as a top priority.

Diverse Coalition

They will be working with a diverse coalition of

stakeholders, including livestock producers, environmentalists,

motorcycle enthusiasts and boat owners.

“We’re going to continue to press for reform or repeal, so

when the opportunities present themselves, we are going to

pursue them,” said American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers

President Chet Thompson by phone. “And if nothing else, we’re

going to find out where folks stand on the issue.”

The first major opportunity may come this week, as the

Senate considers sweeping energy legislation. Senator Pat

Toomey, a Republican from Pennsylvania, has proposed an

amendment that would do away with RFS mandates for traditional

renewable fuels while preserving existing requirements for

advanced, next-generation alternatives.

Toomey’s ethanol-only amendment is viewed as unlikely to

achieve 50 votes for adoption, much less the 60 that would

probably be necessary under a Senate agreement.

Sunset RFS?

Another possible amendment being discussed by Senate

Republicans would sunset the renewable fuel standard in 2022.

Current law sets annual biofuel targets through 2022; after

then, it is up to the Environmental Protection Agency to decide

how and whether to continue quotas.

“Ending the RFS in 2022 sure makes sense post-Iowa as a

starting point,” Tesoro’s Brown said.

Although an amendment to kill the RFS in 2022 falls short

of the immediate, full repeal that oil interests are seeking, it

would represent a political win for the sector — and could be a

stepping stone to broader changes. Thompson, with the refiners

group, said it also would help dispel a myth that the program is

already set to expire without intervention from Congress. 

“We believe full repeal is the way to go, but we’re also

open to having discussions on other types of meaningful reform,

including a phaseout,” Thompson said.

If passed, the Senate energy bill would be negotiated with

a separate House-passed measure. It is unclear whether any

biofuel provisions, if added, would be retained as part of that


To contact the reporter on this story:

Jennifer A. Dlouhy in Washington at

To contact the editors responsible for this story:

Jon Morgan at

Elizabeth Wasserman

About BloombergNEF

BloombergNEF (BNEF) is a strategic research provider covering global commodity markets and the disruptive technologies driving the transition to a low-carbon economy. Our expert coverage assesses pathways for the power, transport, industry, buildings and agriculture sectors to adapt to the energy transition. We help commodity trading, corporate strategy, finance and policy professionals navigate change and generate opportunities.
Sign up for our free monthly newsletter →

Want to learn how we help our clients put it all together? Contact us